Published: · Region: Southeast Asia · Category: conflict

Arakan Army Uses Captured 122mm Howitzer to Hit Military Positions Near Sittwe

The Arakan Army has turned a captured 122mm D‑30 / PL96 howitzer against Myanmar’s military near Sittwe in Rakhine State, raising the risk for civilians living close to new rounds of heavy artillery fire.

Heavy artillery has reappeared around Sittwe in Myanmar’s Rakhine State, where the Arakan Army is firing on military positions using a captured 122mm D‑30 / PL96 towed howitzer that originally belonged to government forces.

Images and reports of an ethnic armed group operating a former army gun underline how much equipment the military has lost to its opponents. A 122mm field howitzer is a substantial piece of kit that requires ammunition, trained crews and some confidence it can be kept in action despite the risk of counter‑battery fire and airstrikes.

There is no clear information yet on casualties or the scale of physical damage from these strikes. Any use of 122mm shells near populated areas, however, carries obvious danger for residents. Mis‑aimed or poorly observed fire can send blast waves and shrapnel into homes, markets and schools within seconds, even when gunners claim to be focusing on strictly military targets.

For civilians in and around Sittwe, artillery fire does more than unsettle daily life. It threatens economic activity, transport routes and already fragile services. Families may again feel pressure to leave their homes or shift relatives out of the city as they weigh the risk of staying against the uncertainty of displacement.

Operationally, the Arakan Army’s use of a captured D‑30 shows how anti‑junta forces are making use of seized hardware. The 122mm system is widely used by the Myanmar military, and its operation can be transferred to rebel crews, including former soldiers who received artillery training before switching sides. That turns the army’s own investment in equipment and skills into a resource for its opponents.

For the military, losing such guns hurts twice. It reduces its own ability to support ground troops while increasing the reach and impact of a rival force with strong local backing in parts of Rakhine. Protecting depots, parked artillery and supply convoys becomes not only a tactical task but a political one, because each weapon captured and reused undercuts claims of firm control.

Sustained Arakan Army pressure around Sittwe poses questions about the junta’s grip on the coastal area and nearby infrastructure. Rakhine includes important maritime approaches and facilities that connect Myanmar to wider regional trade and energy networks. If fighting intensifies near Sittwe’s key sites, commercial and outside actors with interests there will have to reassess their exposure.

The episode fits a wider trend inside Myanmar’s conflict. Ethnic armed organizations and anti‑coup forces are fielding heavier weapons and engaging in more conventional battles where territory, artillery and logistics shape outcomes. That does not mean they are close to toppling the authorities, but it complicates the military’s operations and increases the humanitarian toll.

Control of heavy weapons influences political leverage. When only government units use large guns, they can impose their will at range. When groups like the Arakan Army fire captured howitzers back toward state positions, it highlights a weakening monopoly on organized force.

Key developments to watch now include confirmation of any damage to critical infrastructure in and around Sittwe, reports of new displacement inside Rakhine, signs of additional heavy weapons ending up in rebel hands, and any change in how the military deploys air power or reinforcements to push these guns beyond range of the city.

Sources