Published: · Region: Middle East · Category: geopolitics

Iraqi premier’s warning to Shiite factions highlights fear of U.S.–Iran war spilling into Iraq

Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi has privately warned Shiite factions that backing Iran militarily in a future war would trigger mass arrests of militia leaders, according to accounts of a closed-door meeting, and cited partial access to a leaked U.S. war plan that once envisioned sending troops into southern Iran from Iraqi territory.

Iraq’s leadership is again confronting the risk that its territory could become a front line in a confrontation between the United States and Iran.

In a closed-door meeting with Shiite political factions, Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi warned that supporting Iran militarily in a future war would lead to mass arrests of militia leaders, according to accounts of the session. He framed such support as crossing a red line for the Iraqi state.

An umbrella group known as the Islamic Resistance in Iraq issued a blunt response. It warned al-Zaidi that any attempt to arrest Shia leaders would result in the fall of the government, underlining how fragile his leverage is over armed factions with political clout.

During the same meeting, al-Zaidi said he had gained partial access to leaks of a U.S. war plan presented to then-President Donald Trump. According to his description, that plan outlined three scenarios, including one in which U.S. troops would enter southern Iran from Iraqi territory. Washington has not publicly confirmed the existence or details of such a plan, and militaries routinely draft options that are never executed, but the claim illustrates the anxieties shaping Iraqi calculations.

For Iraqis, the stakes run through daily life as much as geopolitics. Many still live with physical damage and economic disruption from earlier U.S. and internal conflicts. Another round of fighting that pulls in American forces, Iran-backed militias, and Iraqi security units would threaten basic security, commerce, and already strained state institutions.

Al-Zaidi’s warnings are an attempt to reassert that the Iraqi state, not Iran-aligned groups, will decide the country’s posture if tensions between Washington and Tehran escalate again. The Islamic Resistance in Iraq’s counter-threat shows how contested that authority remains.

These internal clashes come as U.S. officials publicly denounce Iran’s current demands as “outrageous and ridiculous,” in the words of U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and as American forces hit Iranian air defense systems on Qeshm Island. Those moves reinforce perceptions among Iraqi actors that a wider confrontation is possible and that Iraq would immediately be caught in the middle.

Key signs to watch now are whether al-Zaidi repeats his warnings in public, whether the government tests its authority with any actual arrests or legal action against Iran-aligned leaders, and whether Baghdad issues a formal position on the use of Iraqi territory in any future conflict between the United States and Iran. Each step would clarify how far the prime minister is prepared to go, and how militias intend to respond.

Sources