Published: · Region: Middle East · Category: conflict

Israel Strikes Southern Lebanon Villages as It Marks Two Years Since Nasrallah Killing Footage

Israeli jets hit multiple targets in southern Lebanon overnight, even as Hezbollah-linked media replayed footage of Hassan Nasrallah driving in Beirut ahead of his 2024 killing. The combination of active strikes and contested imagery keeps civilians in southern Lebanon exposed and shows both sides still fighting over the story as well as the terrain.

Israeli warplanes launched new strikes on villages in southern Lebanon overnight, while Hezbollah’s media arm revived images of its former leader in an effort to shape memories of his killing two years ago.

The Israel Defense Forces said fighter jets attacked targets in several locations in the south, listing Tibnit, Shuba, al‑Mansouri, Nabatieh al‑Fawqa, the Ali al‑Taher ridge and Mifdoun among the areas hit. The nature of the targets was not specified in the reporting available, and there was no immediate information on casualties or the extent of physical damage.

At the same time, the Al‑Manar network, which is affiliated with Hezbollah, marked the “second anniversary of his elimination” by broadcasting footage that it said showed Hassan Nasrallah driving around "like any ordinary person" in the Dahieh district of Beirut before he was killed. Related material circulated about the moments of the strike on Friday 27 September 2024, a few minutes after 18:00, framing those hours as historic and inviting viewers to revisit them.

For residents of southern Lebanese villages named in the latest strikes, this combination of live fire and anniversary messaging translates into renewed fear that their towns are locked into a long-running shadow war. Airstrikes at night put families back into basements and stairwells, disrupt farming, and make basic tasks like travel, schooling and medical care harder. In Beirut’s southern suburbs, the replayed footage is a reminder that political leadership and everyday life share the same streets, and that what looks ordinary can quickly become a target.

Operationally, the IDF’s list of struck locations spans both populated areas and terrain features such as the Ali al‑Taher ridge. That suggests a mix of strikes on suspected launch sites, observation positions or infrastructure tied to Hezbollah and its allies. Israel has long targeted southern Lebanon to reduce rocket fire and cross‑border infiltration, while trying to manage the risk of provoking a full‑scale war with a movement that retains significant arsenal and local support.

The Al‑Manar broadcasts highlight a different front: the narrative one. By showing Nasrallah "like any ordinary person" before his killing, Hezbollah-linked media aim to humanize a leader Israel saw as a core strategic threat and to frame his death as martyrdom rather than decapitation. For supporters, that imagery can reinforce a sense of continuity and resilience; for Israel, it underscores that removing a single figure does not immediately dissolve the network, and that the group can still rally followers with curated history.

Strategically, the coexistence of active air operations and media commemoration shows that neither side is treating the other as a spent force. Israel is still taking kinetic action deep inside Lebanese territory, and Hezbollah is still projecting a story in which its leaders and fighters remain central and defiant. Civilians live in the space between those choices, as current strikes and past killings interact to shape where they feel safe and where they do not.

Signals to watch now include whether strike tempo in southern Lebanon increases or shifts closer to major population centres, whether Hezbollah responds with cross‑border fire or new kinds of attacks, and how Lebanese authorities react to mounting pressure on communities under bombardment. Changes in the tone or frequency of Al‑Manar’s messaging around Nasrallah’s death will also offer clues about how Hezbollah wants its supporters to interpret both the loss of its former leader and the risks of another major confrontation.

Sources