Published: · Region: Middle East · Category: geopolitics

Trump Orders All U.S. Weapons Out of Iraq, Shift to Permanent Hub in Jordan

President Trump has ordered U.S. troops to withdraw all American weapons from Iraq this month and move them permanently to Jordan, an official said, reshaping how Washington bases firepower in the region.

Pulling U.S. weapons out of Iraq and shifting them into Jordan isn’t just a basing tweak. It changes where American firepower sits in the Middle East and which allies absorb the risk if fighting flares.

An official said on 19 September that President Donald Trump has ordered U.S. troops to withdraw all American weapons from Iraq this month and reposition them permanently in Jordan as a regional hub. That points to the removal of U.S.-controlled armaments from Iraqi soil and a decision to consolidate stockpiles and logistics in a country that borders Israel, Syria, Iraq and Saudi Arabia.

For Iraq’s government, the shift undercuts a U.S. military presence that once anchored parts of Baghdad’s security planning and offered some counterweight to Iranian-backed militias. Hardware that underpins deterrence is physically leaving the country, and Iraqi units that depend on U.S. support now face uncertainty about how, and from where, that backing would arrive in a crisis.

Jordan, in turn, is being asked to host more of the burden. Turning it into a permanent regional hub means more weapons depots, more military traffic through its bases, and more attention from the adversaries those weapons are meant to deter. Infrastructure near Jordanian airfields and logistics hubs could become higher-value targets if a conflict with Iran or other actors escalates.

Operationally, the move could tighten U.S. response times to flashpoints near Jordan, such as southern Syria and western Iraq, while making it harder to surge forces into northern or central Iraq without advance staging. Commanders will have to rethink supply lines with a heavier focus on routes from Jordanian territory and less on the more exposed footprint inside Iraq.

Strategically, the decision signals that Washington is less willing to carry the political and physical risk of keeping major weapons stockpiles in a country where parliamentarians and armed factions have repeatedly called for a U.S. exit. It leaves Iraq more exposed to Iran’s network of militias and political allies, and ties U.S. planning more tightly to Jordan’s stability and its relationship with Washington.

For Iran, the picture cuts both ways. A lighter U.S. weapons footprint in Iraq reduces direct American leverage in Baghdad and may ease pressure on Iranian-backed groups there. At the same time, a hardened U.S. hub in Jordan shortens the distance from American assets to Iranian partners in Syria and along Israel’s frontiers.

What matters next is whether the weapons move is folded into a broader political framework. Watch for Iraqi officials’ public reaction, any clarification from Washington on the scale of forces remaining in Iraq, and how Iran-linked armed groups respond. In Jordan, the clearest signals will be visible base expansions, new deployments, or fresh security aid agreements that show how central Amman is becoming to U.S. regional plans.

Sources