# [30D] Gulf States Likely to Hedge Between US Security Guarantees and De-Facto Accommodation With Iran and Houthis

*Issued Thursday, September 10, 2026 at 11:09 AM UTC — Hamer Intelligence Services Desk*

**Issued**: 2026-09-10T11:09:31.203Z (3h ago)
**Expires**: 2026-10-10T11:09:31.203Z (30d from now)
**Category**: GEOPOLITICAL | **Confidence**: 60% | **Impact**: HIGH
**Risk Direction**: volatile
**Affected Regions**: Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Oman, Red Sea and Gulf littoral
**Affected Assets**: Regional diplomatic alignments (e.g., Abraham Accords trajectory), Security cooperation frameworks with the US, Energy infrastructure protection agreements
**Permalink**: https://hamerintel.com/data/forecasts/24389.md
**Source**: https://hamerintel.com/forecasts

---

## Prediction

Over the next 30 days, as Houthi leverage over the Red Sea grows and Iran–US confrontation deepens, Gulf monarchies are likely to hedge more aggressively—publicly affirming US security ties while privately exploring understandings with Tehran and Ansarallah to protect critical trade routes. Saudi Arabia and the UAE, in particular, will seek to avoid being frontline targets if Israel–Iran tensions spill over into attacks on energy infrastructure. This could complicate US and Israeli deterrence strategies and create fractures within prospective anti-Iran coalitions. Evidence would include muted public reactions to Houthi gains, leaks about direct or indirect talks with Ansarallah, and calibrated Gulf responses to Israeli rhetoric; a hard Gulf pivot toward full-throated alignment with Israel against Iran, including overt basing or strike support, would represent a different course.

## Drivers

- Houthi territorial surge altering Red Sea and Gulf security architecture
- Israel’s threat to hit Iranian energy assets
- Emerging trend: sustained Iran–US confrontation and regional actors’ desire to avoid entrapment