# Turkish Bailiffs Seize Iranian Caspian Airlines Jet in Istanbul Over €3 Million Debt

*Tuesday, September 29, 2026 at 12:09 PM UTC — Hamer Intelligence Services Desk*

**Published**: 2026-09-29T12:09:20.900Z (2h ago)
**Category**: markets | **Region**: Middle East
**Importance**: 7/10
**Sources**: OSINT
**Permalink**: https://hamerintel.com/data/articles/19163.md
**Source**: https://hamerintel.com/summaries

---

**Deck**: Turkish court officers seized a Caspian Airlines Boeing 737 at Istanbul Airport as it prepared to fly to Iran, ordering passengers off and holding the jet over an unpaid €3 million debt to Turkish aviation company ACM Temsil Gozetim.

A scheduled Iranian passenger flight from Istanbul was halted on the tarmac when Turkish bailiffs moved in to seize the aircraft over unpaid bills.

The Caspian Airlines Boeing 737, registered as EP‑KPB, was preparing to depart Istanbul for Tehran with passengers on board when court enforcement officers arrived, according to reports. They ordered everyone to disembark and placed the plane under seizure at the airport.

Turkish aviation services company ACM Temsil Gozetim says Caspian Airlines owes it €3 million, and the jet was taken as an asset to secure that claim under a court order. The aircraft is being kept at the airport while the legal process continues.

For passengers, the intervention turned a routine departure into a sudden cancellation and raised questions about when and how they would be able to travel. For Caspian Airlines, the loss of use of a Boeing 737 underscores how financial disputes abroad can directly ground its fleet.

The case also shows how local courts and enforcement officers in Turkey can act on commercial claims against foreign carriers, including those from countries under heavy international sanctions.

What happens next will depend on whether the reported debt is settled or contested. Quick payment could see the plane returned to service, while a prolonged legal fight would keep the aircraft idle and could encourage other creditors to pursue similar actions against the airline’s assets overseas.