# Venezuelan ex‑deputies close second round of talks with accords on media and justice issues

*Saturday, September 26, 2026 at 4:12 AM UTC — Hamer Intelligence Services Desk*

**Published**: 2026-09-26T04:12:44.189Z (3h ago)
**Category**: geopolitics | **Region**: Latin America
**Importance**: 6/10
**Sources**: OSINT
**Permalink**: https://hamerintel.com/data/articles/18834.md
**Source**: https://hamerintel.com/summaries

---

**Deck**: Former Venezuelan lawmakers and government representatives ended a second round of negotiations with agreements described as media and justice accords, teleSUR English reported. The talks address areas that affect journalists, courts, and politically active citizens in a tightly controlled environment.

A group of former Venezuelan deputies and government representatives has completed a second round of talks that produced accords on media and justice matters, according to a report from teleSUR English published on 26 September. The participants were not fully detailed in the brief summary, but the agreements indicate that both sides are willing to negotiate in areas that shape public information and the judicial system.

The talks bring together ex‑deputies and figures aligned with the authorities in Caracas. Describing the outcome as media and justice accords points to understandings, however limited, on how the state interacts with news outlets and how courts handle certain cases.

Any change in media‑related rules has direct implications for journalists and outlets operating under restrictive conditions. Even modest adjustments can influence which stories are published and how newsrooms assess legal risk.

On the justice side, agreements can touch the procedures that affect defendants, lawyers, and judges in politically sensitive files, though the teleSUR English report did not provide the text or scope of the measures.

For the government, presenting such accords can be a way to show that dialogue is taking place around institutions that have drawn criticism. For the ex‑deputies, obtaining any concrete commitments offers a way to argue that engagement delivers some results.

Observers inside and outside Venezuela will now look for practical signs that the media and justice accords are being implemented: changes in official communication with outlets, shifts in court practices, or specific cases that reflect new approaches. Those developments will determine whether this second round of talks translates into noticeable differences in daily life for reporters, activists, and people facing the justice system.