# US ‘hellish’ Russia sanctions bill heads to Trump as India and China push back on energy pressure

*Thursday, September 17, 2026 at 10:06 AM UTC — Hamer Intelligence Services Desk*

**Published**: 2026-09-17T10:06:14.206Z (2h ago)
**Category**: geopolitics | **Region**: Global
**Importance**: 9/10
**Sources**: OSINT
**Permalink**: https://hamerintel.com/data/articles/18091.md
**Source**: https://hamerintel.com/summaries

---

**Deck**: The US House has passed a sweeping Russia sanctions bill that targets Moscow’s energy and defense sectors and lets Donald Trump impose tariffs of up to 100% on buyers of Russian oil and gas. India warns the move could damage ties and vows to keep buying Russian crude, while China says its cooperation with other countries is not Washington’s business.

A major US sanctions bill that could hit buyers of Russian energy far beyond the battlefield is now on its way to Donald Trump, forcing a decision that will reverberate from Moscow to New Delhi and Beijing.

The US House of Representatives has approved legislation championed by Senator Lindsey Graham and described as “hellish” sanctions on Russia. The package targets Russia’s energy industry, defense sector and sanctions‑evasion networks. It also gives Trump authority to impose tariffs of up to 100% on countries that continue to buy Russian oil and gas, tightening pressure on the revenue that funds the Kremlin’s war.

India is already warning Washington about the cost of that approach. Citing Reuters, Indian officials told the US that new tariffs on purchases of Russian oil could affect bilateral relations. New Delhi also signaled it plans to keep buying Russian crude despite the new sanctions package, a stance it has framed publicly as putting “1.4 billion people first” in response to US tariff threats over Russian oil.

China is pushing back in broader terms. Beijing said its cooperation with other countries shouldn’t be subject to interference from third parties, rejecting the idea that Washington can police its partnerships through secondary sanctions or tariffs. That position matters for Chinese firms active in energy, shipping, insurance or finance, which could find routine dealings with Russian counterparts suddenly exposed to US penalties if Trump uses the new powers aggressively.

From Moscow, the tone remains confrontational. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said there had been no tangible progress in restoring relations with the West, underlining that the Kremlin sees itself in a long‑term standoff rather than a temporary sanctions dispute. The new US bill would deepen that rift by going after the money and supply chains that underpin Russia’s war effort, including defense production and financial channels used to route payments around existing measures.

The most immediate impact would fall on countries that still import significant volumes of Russian crude and fuels. They could be forced to weigh cheaper barrels against the risk of US tariffs or other measures if the White House moves to use its new authority. Shipping companies carrying Russian cargoes would have to factor in higher compliance and financing costs as banks reassess their exposure.

India faces an especially sharp trade‑off. It has made discounted Russian oil a central piece of its energy strategy, helping keep domestic prices in check. Losing that cushion or paying a tariff premium would feed back into fuel and industrial costs. For Washington, turning the screws too hard on a key Indo‑Pacific partner risks straining a relationship seen as central to balancing China.

The bill also hands Trump wide discretion. He could fully deploy the harsh tariffs, hold them in reserve as leverage with partners such as India and China, or move cautiously in the name of alliance management and market stability. That flexibility creates space for diplomacy but also the possibility of sudden escalation if the White House decides to make an example of specific buyers.

The next signals to watch are Trump’s choice to sign or veto the bill, any guidance on how the new tariff authority will be used, and concrete reactions from major buyers of Russian energy. If Washington starts pointing to particular cargoes, routes or companies as potential targets, the pressure will move from political statements to immediate decisions on energy flows and trade.