# Trump’s Expected Green Light on F‑35s to Turkey Puts NATO Unity and Gulf Balances to the Test

*Tuesday, July 7, 2026 at 6:19 AM UTC — Hamer Intelligence Services Desk*

**Published**: 2026-07-07T06:19:30.062Z (3h ago)
**Category**: geopolitics | **Region**: Middle East
**Importance**: 8/10
**Sources**: OSINT
**Permalink**: https://hamerintel.com/data/articles/10241.md
**Source**: https://hamerintel.com/summaries

---

**Deck**: President Trump is expected to tell Turkey’s leader in Ankara that he is willing to restore Ankara’s access to the F‑35 fighter program, reversing years of exclusion over Russian arms purchases. The potential deal, reportedly facilitated via Qatari channels, would reshape airpower balances from the Black Sea to the Eastern Mediterranean and expose fresh fractures inside NATO.

President Donald Trump is poised to reopen one of NATO’s most sensitive files by signaling that the United States is ready to let Turkey back into the F‑35 program, according to expectations reported ahead of his visit to Ankara. The move would reverse years of U.S. policy and sanctions over Ankara’s purchase of Russian S‑400 air defenses, and could redraw the airpower landscape across the Black Sea, the Eastern Mediterranean, and the wider Middle East.

The New York Times has reported that Trump is expected to tell President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan that he is willing to allow Turkey renewed access to the fifth‑generation stealth aircraft during his visit to the Turkish capital. In parallel, critics of the move pointed to Trump’s travel on a Qatari aircraft and framed it as a bid to sell F‑35s to Turkey with Qatari support, tying the decision to what they describe as Ankara and Doha’s sympathy for the Muslim Brotherhood. Those characterizations are political claims rather than confirmed terms of any deal, but they signal how contested any F‑35 arrangement will be within the region and across the alliance.

For Turkey, regaining access to the F‑35 would be a strategic prize. Ankara was once a key industrial and customer partner in the program before being cut off in 2019. Restoring that link would modernize the Turkish Air Force with a platform designed to evade advanced air defenses and to integrate deeply with NATO’s broader air and command systems. It would also offer Turkish defense firms a path back into one of the world’s most lucrative aerospace supply chains.

For other NATO states, especially Greece and those on the alliance’s eastern flank, the prospect is more complicated. Athens has moved forward with its own advanced fighter procurements partly on the assumption that Turkey would remain outside the F‑35 club. A Turkish return would reintroduce a qualitative edge to Ankara’s arsenal that could unsettle the air balance in the Aegean and the Eastern Mediterranean, precisely where maritime boundaries, gas exploration rights, and military posturing already collide.

Within the Gulf, the reported use of a Qatari plane for Trump’s travel, and suggestions of Qatari involvement in a potential deal, underline how regional partners use their relationships with Washington to shape outcomes that affect rivals and allies alike. For governments in Cairo, Abu Dhabi, and Riyadh, any arrangement that strengthens Ankara’s military position while deepening its ties with Doha would revive old concerns about a bloc of states whose political Islam links and foreign policy activism they oppose.

The move also carries implications for NATO’s technology security. Turkey still possesses the Russian‑made S‑400 system that led to its ejection from the F‑35 program in the first place. Any U.S. decision to bring Ankara back in will have to address long‑standing Pentagon fears that operating S‑400s alongside F‑35s could expose the jet’s sensitive signatures to Russian intelligence, even indirectly. How Washington and Ankara claim to manage that risk will be watched closely in other capitals weighing Chinese or Russian systems against Western aircraft.

At a moment when NATO is trying to project unity at a summit in Ankara, resetting the F‑35 relationship with Turkey would amount to a calculated gamble: betting that bringing a difficult ally closer on high‑end technology will make it harder, not easier, for Ankara to drift toward Moscow. The question is whether other allies, and the U.S. Congress, accept that logic.

Signals to watch next include any formal U.S. announcements on lifting sanctions or restarting Turkish industrial participation, reactions from Greece and other eastern Mediterranean NATO members, and whether Moscow publicly responds to a potential F‑35 return. The details of how, or whether, Turkey ring‑fences its S‑400 systems from NATO networks will be a critical test of how far this reset can realistically go.