# [WARNING] US–Iran Hormuz talks progress but agreement still not sealed

*Monday, May 25, 2026 at 9:29 AM UTC — Hamer Intelligence Services Desk*

**Detected**: 2026-05-25T09:29:22.781Z (2h ago)
**Tags**: MARKET, energy, oil, geopolitics, Iran, Strait-of-Hormuz, risk-premium
**Sources**: OSINT
**Permalink**: https://hamerintel.com/data/alerts/8042.md
**Source**: https://hamerintel.com/summaries

---

**Summary**: Iran’s Foreign Ministry confirms broad understandings with the US but stresses that a final agreement is not imminent and that Hormuz issues were excluded from the current MoU. This tempers earlier market optimism on a rapid Hormuz de‑risking and keeps a geopolitical risk premium embedded in crude benchmarks.

## Detail

1) What happened:
New statements from Tehran’s Foreign Ministry indicate that Iran and the US have reached understandings on a large part of their agenda but that no one can claim an agreement is imminent, citing institutional constraints in US decision‑making. Separately, Iran’s Defense Ministry has excluded the Strait of Hormuz issue from the current memorandum of understanding, and Iranian officials warn that Israel may attempt to sabotage the process. These comments come after earlier wires suggested progress toward a framework that could reopen or de‑risk traffic through Hormuz and increase the likelihood of looser constraints on Iranian oil exports.

2) Supply/demand impact:
The immediate signal is that earlier expectations for a rapid, comprehensive deal that would both formalize safe, toll‑free passage through Hormuz and potentially enable materially higher Iranian crude exports were premature. Iranian exports have already crept higher de facto, but a codified deal could unlock an additional ~0.5–1.0 mb/d over time and sharply reduce tail‑risk of shipping disruptions. The clarification that Hormuz is outside the current MoU and that an agreement is not imminent implies that: (a) upside surprise to Iranian exports remains capped in the near term, and (b) the probability of a renewed Hormuz disruption or tit‑for‑tat tanker incidents remains non‑trivial.

3) Affected assets/direction:
This is marginally bullish for crude vs. the price action of the last 12–24 hours, where markets sold off on optimism around a quick US–Iran deal and Hormuz reopening. Brent and WTI could see some retracement as traders reassess how quickly additional barrels and lower shipping risk will materialize. Front‑end timespreads may remain supported by geopolitical risk, and Middle East tanker insurance premia and freight rates are unlikely to compress further for now.

4) Historical precedent:
Past Iran nuclear and sanctions episodes (2013–2015 JPOA/JCPoA phases) show that crude markets respond not just to signed deals but to credible expectations of export trajectories and shipping safety. Walk‑backs, delays, or signals of internal US constraints have repeatedly put a risk premium back into prices after initial optimism.

5) Duration:
Unless and until there is a concrete, signed framework that explicitly addresses Hormuz security and sanctions relief, the market will sustain a geopolitical premium in crude and related shipping. Today’s messaging likely affects near‑term pricing (days to weeks) rather than establishing a new structural regime, but it caps further downside in Brent/WTI that had been predicated on a swift de‑escalation.


**AFFECTED ASSETS:** Brent Crude, WTI Crude, Dubai Crude, Tanker freight (AG–Asia), Middle East CDS, USD/IRR (offshore), Oil‑linked EM FX (e.g., RUB, NOK)