# [WARNING] US says Iran’s Hormuz closure attempts now largely ineffective

*Monday, August 24, 2026 at 6:06 AM UTC — Hamer Intelligence Services Desk*

**Detected**: 2026-08-24T06:06:26.386Z (3h ago)
**Tags**: MARKET, energy, oil, shipping, StraitOfHormuz, riskPremium, MiddleEast
**Sources**: OSINT
**Permalink**: https://hamerintel.com/data/alerts/19492.md
**Source**: https://hamerintel.com/summaries

---

**Summary**: US Vice President J.D. Vance claims the US can still move 7–15 million barrels per day through the Strait of Hormuz despite Iranian attempts to close it. This points to reduced tail‑risk of a full Hormuz shutdown but confirms a persistently militarized environment that maintains an elevated oil risk premium.

## Detail

The US Vice President stated that despite Iranian attempts to close the Strait of Hormuz, US‑led forces are currently able to move between 7 and 15 million barrels of oil per day through the chokepoint. The comment serves two purposes: reassure markets that worst‑case disruption scenarios are not materializing, and signal that Iran is under substantial pressure at sea as part of the broader campaign against Tehran.

From a flow perspective, global crude and condensate exports via Hormuz total roughly 17–20 mb/d in normal conditions. The 7–15 mb/d range cited suggests that, under current security operations, the bulk of seaborne oil can still transit, though possibly with intermittent disruptions, reroutings, or convoying. The lower bound implies that in a stress scenario some 3–10 mb/d could be at risk of delay or diversion, but the statement’s tone is that present operations are effectively containing that risk.

For markets, this marginally reduces the probability-weighted downside supply shock compared with a full Hormuz closure, which would be a systemic event for crude, products, and LNG. However, the acknowledgment of ongoing Iranian attempts to close the Strait confirms a quasi‑wartime operating environment, keeping a structural risk premium embedded in crude benchmarks and tanker insurance costs. Time spreads and options skew in oil may ease slightly if traders mark down the likelihood of a catastrophic disruption, but implied volatility is likely to stay elevated.

Historically, episodes such as the 1980s Tanker War and the 2019–2020 Gulf incidents (attacks on tankers, Abqaiq strike) generated significant but episodic price spikes tied to discrete attacks and credible shutdown risk. Here, the message is that while the extreme tail risk is somewhat contained, the conflict is ongoing and being escalated economically (see concurrent sanction threats). The net impact is to support crude and tanker markets at higher-than-peacetime levels over a multi‑month horizon, though this particular statement by itself may trim some of the most extreme disruption fears.

**AFFECTED ASSETS:** Brent Crude, WTI Crude, Dubai/Oman crude, Tanker insurance premia, Front-month crude options volatility