# [WARNING] Reports: Trump Threatens Iran Shipping Deal, Floats F‑35s for Türkiye, $88B War Budget

*Wednesday, June 24, 2026 at 9:31 PM UTC — Hamer Intelligence Services Desk*

**Detected**: 2026-06-24T21:31:15.784Z (3h ago)
**Tags**: UnitedStates, Iran, Turkey, NATO, MiddleEast, Energy, Defense, Markets
**Sources**: OSINT
**Permalink**: https://hamerintel.com/data/alerts/11791.md
**Source**: https://hamerintel.com/summaries

---

**Summary**: Trump’s public red line against Iran shipping fees, coupled with talk of selling F‑35s to Türkiye and an $87.6 billion supplemental funding request heavily tied to Iran, signals a potential hard pivot in US Middle East policy. Energy routes, NATO cohesion, and Israel–Türkiye dynamics are all in play, with direct consequences for oil prices, defense stocks, and regional security calculations.

## Detail

Between 20:36 and 21:02 UTC on 24 June, multiple US policy signals emerged that, taken together, suggest a sharper and more transactional US posture on Iran and Türkiye with direct implications for energy markets and NATO’s internal balance.

First, at 21:02 UTC and reiterated in detailed remarks filed at 21:01 UTC, President Trump said he would reject any final Iran deal that includes “any kind of fees for shipping,” calling such a deal “unacceptable.” This appears to refer to prospective arrangements where Iran might be compensated via levies on maritime traffic or oil flows linked to sanctions relief. In parallel, a report at 20:36 UTC indicates the administration is seeking roughly $672 million specifically to “eliminate Iran’s ability to develop a nuclear weapon” as part of a larger ~$80 billion supplemental funding package; another report at 20:38 UTC puts the total supplemental request at $87.6 billion. The Iran line item is aimed at enriched uranium removal, disposal, and IAEA verification.

Second, at 20:46 UTC and again in Trump’s on‑camera comments at 21:01 UTC, the president signaled willingness to provide advanced airpower to Türkiye: he spoke of potentially selling F‑35 fighter jets and confirmed a positive stance on Türkiye’s request for F‑110 engines and broader defense cooperation. A separate report at 20:23 UTC notes the administration is already pushing a $700 million General Electric jet engine sale for Türkiye’s Kaan fighter, working around congressional objections ahead of a NATO summit in Ankara.

For people and governments in the region, these moves recalibrate risk. Iran and Gulf neighbors must assume Washington is ready to tighten nuclear constraints while blocking any mechanism that indirectly monetizes shipping lanes for Tehran. That hardens the stakes in and around the Strait of Hormuz, where any miscalculation can choke off oil and LNG flows that underpin household fuel prices globally.

For Israel, explicit US openness to returning Türkiye to the F‑35 program and deepening engine support challenges its long‑held qualitative airpower edge and may strain already tense Ankara‑Jerusalem relations. Turkish leaders, by contrast, are being publicly courted as a “strong member of NATO,” raising Ankara’s leverage inside the alliance and over Black Sea, Syrian, and Eastern Med theaters.

Markets and industries face several immediate pressure points:
- Energy and shipping: Trump’s rejection of shipping‑linked Iran fees complicates any sanctions‑relief architecture built around maritime arrangements, adding uncertainty for tanker operators, P&I clubs, and Gulf exporters planning for a post‑deal environment.
- Defense and aerospace: Lockheed Martin (F‑35), GE Aerospace (F‑110 and Kaan engines), and US missile‑defense contractors stand to benefit from both the supplemental budget and any Türkiye deals, while Israeli defense equities could face repricing if investors see Ankara regaining high‑end airframes.
- Currencies and rates: A more confrontational Iran posture tends to support the dollar via safe‑haven flows while pressuring EM FX exposed to oil import costs and regional risk. Turkish assets could see a speculative bid on arms‑deal optimism but remain vulnerable to sanctions or congressional backlash.

Over the next 24–48 hours, watch for: (1) concrete language from the White House or State on the shape of any Iran agreement and how shipping is treated; (2) congressional reaction to the $87.6 billion supplemental, especially the Iran and Türkiye lines; (3) Israeli and European responses to possible F‑35 transfers to Türkiye; and (4) any signaling from Tehran or IRGC naval forces in the Gulf that might test US resolve on shipping and sanctions. A single naval incident or explicit Iranian counter‑threat around Hormuz would quickly move this from policy signaling to direct market disruption.

**MARKET IMPACT ASSESSMENT:**
Heightened geopolitical risk premium for oil and LNG (Hormuz, Gulf shipping); potential upside for US defense equities (Lockheed Martin, GE, Raytheon/RTX) and select Turkish assets if arms deals advance; possible pressure on Israeli defense sector and insurers exposed to Gulf shipping routes; FX watch on TRY and regional EM currencies if US‑Iran tensions or intra‑NATO frictions sharpen.